Every asset behind the sponsor material, grouped by the job it does in a conversation. Each card says what it is and what to use it for.
Most sponsor conversations need three things: proof that the CM Shri pilot happened and went well (group 1), proof the model works for students from underserved backgrounds (group 3), and the case for why gifted children specifically (group 5). The rest is supporting material.
The text of the main page in an editable form, and the folder holding every file that is not a public link.
Four Grade 10 students, three weeks at MAHE Manipal, the Delhi education department's own senior officer present for two days. This is the group a Delhi sponsor will care about most.
For a sponsor who has never seen a residential gifted programme. Start with the May 2026 recap; the 2024 film is the best single watch.
Three years of sponsored JNV and similar students, with the only before-and-after study done by a third party. This is the evidence group.
What alumni say years later. Note that the panel is fee-paying alumni; the point is what a residential programme does to a child, not evidence about underserved students specifically.
For the sponsor who asks "why not spend this on foundational learning?" CSF's own report is the strongest card here.
Where the money goes, who delivers, who identifies, who hosts.
staff voice from camp records · student the student's own words · third party someone outside GenWise · public a public post · pending being added · expires temporary link